Linked vs. Nested Azure ARM Templates: Key Differences and When to Use Each

Build once, deploy anywhere with custom reusable Azure ARM templates designed for scalable and consistent infrastructure.

Introduction

As ARM template deployments grow in complexity, structuring them correctly becomes critical. In Microsoft Azure, two primary approaches exist for organizing complex deployments:

  • Linked Templates
  • Nested Templates

Both are built using the same deployment mechanism, but they serve different purposes. Choosing the wrong approach can lead to unnecessary complexity, poor maintainability, or deployment issues.

This article explains the differences, strengths, and when to use each.

What They Have in Common

Both linked and nested templates:

  • Use Microsoft.Resources/deployments
  • Support Parameter Passing
  • Allow Dependency Control
  • Enable Modular Deployments

The difference is not in capability, but in how they are structured and managed.

Linked Templates

Definition

Linked templates are external ARM templates referenced by a parent template.

They are stored outside the main template and accessed via a URI.

Key Characteristics

  • Stored in external locations
  • Referenced using templateLink
  • Require network access
  • Suitable for reuse across projects

Advantages

  • High Reusability
  • Better For Large-Scale Deployments
  • Supports Team-Based Ownership
  • Easier Version Control and Updates

Limitations

  • Requires hosting (Azure Storage, repository, etc.)
  • Access control must be managed
  • Dependency on external availability

Nested Templates

Definition

Nested templates are inline templates defined inside a parent template.

They exist within the same file.

Key Characteristics

  • Embedded Inside Parent Template
  • No External Dependencies
  • Uses Inline Template Definition
  • Single-File Deployment

Advantages

  • No need for External Storage
  • Easier Portability
  • Simplified Deployment Packaging
  • Good for Logical Grouping

Limitations

  • Limited Reusability
  • Large Templates Become Difficult to Manage
  • Not ideal for Multi-Team Environments

Key Differences

Location

  • Linked templates: external files
  • Nested templates: inside parent template

Reusability

  • Linked templates: reusable across projects
  • Nested templates: limited reuse

Deployment Dependency

  • Linked templates: require accessible URI
  • Nested templates: self-contained

Complexity Management

  • Linked templates: better for large systems
  • Nested templates: better for moderate complexity

Team Collaboration

  • Linked templates: supports separation of responsibilities
  • Nested templates: centralized control

When to Use Linked Templates

Use linked templates when:

  • Building enterprise-scale deployments
  • Multiple teams manage different components
  • Templates need to be reused across environments
  • Version control and lifecycle management are required

When to Use Nested Templates

Use nested templates when:

  • You want a single deployment file
  • External hosting is not desirable
  • Deployment complexity is moderate
  • Logical grouping within one template is sufficient

Practical Comparison Scenario

Scenario: Deploying a full environment

Components:

  • Networking
  • Compute
  • Storage
  • Identity

Using Linked Templates

  • network.json
  • compute.json
  • storage.json
  • identity.json

Each managed separately and referenced by the main template.

Best for:

  • Large environments
  • Team-based deployments

Using Nested Templates

All components defined inside one template:

  • Nested section for networking
  • Nested section for compute
  • Nested section for storage

Best for:

  • Controlled, single-team deployments
  • Simpler environments

Common Mistakes

Using Nested Templates for Large Systems

Results in:

  • Massive files
  • Difficult maintenance
  • Poor readability

Using Linked Templates Without Structure

Results in:

  • Poor organization
  • Hard-to-track dependencies
  • Deployment confusion

Ignoring Deployment Dependencies

Both approaches require:

  • Proper dependency management
  • Correct deployment order

Best Practice Approach

In real-world environments, the best solution is often a combination.

Hybrid Model

  • Use linked templates for major components
  • Use nested templates for small logical groupings

This provides:

  • Scalability
  • Maintainability
  • Flexibility

Conclusion

Linked and nested ARM templates are not competing approaches. They are complementary tools designed for different scenarios.

  • Linked templates provide scalability and reuse
  • Nested templates provide simplicity and portability

Choosing the right approach depends on:

  • Deployment size
  • Team structure
  • Reusability requirements

ARM templates are not just about deployment.
They are about how you Design and Organize Infrastructure at Scale.

Need a custom solution?
Check out our Azure Custom ARM Template Services for tailored deployments based on your specific requirements.

0 comments

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.